Engaging Hospital Leadership for Data Breach Defense

Explore how hospital executives can enhance data breach defense through active engagement with IT/IS teams. This article outlines critical strategies for fostering collaboration and ensuring robust cybersecurity measures.

 More

Improving organizational engagement is paramount in the face of increasing data breach attacks. This engagement must extend beyond the IT/IS department and involve hospital executive leadership. This article will highlight the importance of hospital executive involvement in data breach defense and provide strategies for effective engagement.

The Need for Hospital Executive Involvement in Data Breach Defense

Hospital executives, including CEOs, COOs, CCOs, CPOs, CAOs, VPs of Clinical Operations, CNIOs, CMOs, and CMIOs, play a critical role in data breach defense. These executives are more familiar with and focus on operations in selected hospitals and clinics than IT/IS staff. They are also more focused on selected hospital systems such as EHR/EMR, Financial, Telemedicine, Laboratory, NICU/Labor, Paging, Payment, Billing, Nursing Station, Health Information Exchange (HIE), Radiology, Badging (physical security), Nutrition, Imaging, and Pyxis Pharmacy.

Moreover, hospital executives have more responsibility for HIPAA regulatory compliance and possible data breach disclosure obligations. They are also more concerned about patient safety, reputational damage, and financial impacts such as regulatory fines and class action lawsuits.

Phases of Data Breach Defense

Joint Planning Stage: This involves the creation of an incident response plan, key systems, policies, and procedures relating to data breaches. Hospital executives need to ensure that the IT/IS department implements standard prevention measures such as MFA, data encryption, patch management, and awareness training. However, IT/IS often needs guidance and help from executives to overcome challenges such as employee resistance to MFA, implementing prevention measures on older and fragile legacy systems, and ensuring all employees participate in recurring awareness training to reduce the impacts of phishing attacks.

Data Breach Prevention Measures: Implementing these measures is crucial but often requires executive oversight. For example, executives can help ensure that all employees understand the importance of MFA and that legacy systems are properly secured.

While IT/IS typically handles detection and response, hospital executives need to be involved in distinguishing between “technical data breaches” and “business data breaches.” Technical data breaches involve determining if data is being lost to a malicious destination, which can be problematic due to false positives. Executives can help clarify whether a data breach is technical or business-related, ensuring timely and appropriate responses.

Data Breach Investigation and Declarations: Even if IT/IS has confirmed malicious activity, hospital executives need to be involved in determining whether to activate an internal incident response process and prepare to submit Data Breach Disclosure documents to HHS/OCR and other appropriate federal or state regulatory organizations. These determinations can be complicated and require the creation of teams involving IT/IS, Hospital Leadership, and outside experts from Legal, Insurance, and other organizations.

Data Breach Response (Containment): Often, in discussions about what happens after a data breach has occurred, the conversation is about the response in terms of the broad incident response plan. However, focusing on the front end of incidence response (containment) is essential in a data breach where time is of the essence. Containment has two different dimensions. First, stopping the bleeding of breached systems is necessary to prevent any further loss or exfiltration of data to malicious sources for those systems. Then, stopping the spread of the bleeding is vital in preventing other systems from future data breach activity.

A major dilemma for hospital leadership is which systems should be shut down during containment. A common IT/IS response to stopping the bleeding is called isolation. This process often involves disconnecting the system operationally so that it is no longer accessible to the network. In concept, the IR plan may have defined the systems that can and should be shut down. But that IR plan may be problematic for several reasons:

  • Out of date, changing scope
  • Shadow IT systems
  • Legacy systems
  • Business pressures that are felt within the first 24-48 hours which may require a change from the IR plan
  • But who makes these decisions?
    • Internal IT organization?
    • An outside Incident response firm?
  • Is hospital executive management delegating or abdicating these crucial decisions to IT or to external IR firms?

Strategies for Engaging Hospital Executives and IT/IS Staff

Provide a Common Understanding and View of Data Breach Activity Status

If possible, hospital executives and the IT/IS organization should have a common operating picture of data breach activity at the hospital or clinic level as well as the underlying health systems (above) that normally hold ePHI data. From an executive and business point of view, this is not about the technical world of SIEMS, IP addresses, or threat hunting. Both teams having the same view can avoid confusion and delays. The goal is to enable organizational synchronization between IT/IS and hospital executives. Certainly, it’s appropriate for IT/IS to have some time to analyze most problems before business executives are informed. Yet, given how overloaded most IT/IS organizations are, a key issue is how much time should elapse before hospital executives get informed. Should there be an early awareness approach to give hospital executives a heads-up regarding potential issues while IT/IS is still investigating?

Specific Data Breach Exercises: Cybersecurity exercises normally focus on handling security incidents. They are not focused on the earlier planning or prevention stage, although exercise outcomes could influence planning and prevention measures. Often, exercise participants will encounter issues (called injections) that an IR plan may not cover. Specific data breach exercises provide a formal process to push hospital executives and IT/IS staff to be much more agile and hopefully collaborative. For data breach exercises, four appropriate elements could be:

  1. Data Breach Detection: Dealing with the vagaries and uncertainties of detection. Understanding and thinking through the evolution of confidence, certainty, knowledge
  2. Data Breach Investigations: Understanding which investigations need to be implemented by IT and which require help beyond IT.
  3. Declarations: As a result of the above investigations, it is often appropriate to have selected formal declarations of data breach status for internal or external purposes. Specialized teams would normally create a more formal declaration:
    • Internal Declaration: Activation of an internal IR plan.
    • External Declarations: Alerting patients, partners, HHS and media (if more than 500 ePHI records have been stolen), formal disclosures to other federal regulators, and to potential state regulators.
  4. Response (Tactical Containment): Making the following, very difficult business decisions:
    • Which systems to isolate or shut down in the face of a data breach.
    • When isolated or disconnected systems can be brought back on-line.
    • When isolated or disconnected systems may need to be brought back online even if technical safety measures (forensic work, prevention, etc.) are not yet finished.

Improving engagement between business executives and IT/IS is critical in the face of increasing data breaches. Hospitals can improve their data breach defense posture by fostering a common understanding of data breach activity and conducting specific data breach detection and response exercises. Celerium offers a data breach defense solution that facilitates visibility into potential breaches for IT/IS teams and hospital executives and automated detection and containment tools that can reduce the overall IT/IS burden.

For more information on our data breach defense program, visit the Celerium website or contact us at [email protected].

About Celerium
Celerium® engineers cyber defense solutions that are easy to implement and manage with minimal IT effort. Hospitals can take advantage of a no-cost subscription to Celerium’s data breach defense program. Learn more at the Celerium website or contact us at [email protected].